What In Tarnation Was This-Josh Naqvi

 What in tarnation was "A Good Man Is Hard to Find" by O'Connor? I read this thing two times just to make sure I did not miss some extravagant detail. There was no detail that I could find. This reading was so dark and depressing, that it made even Freud look happy. I took it to mean old world meets new world. Granny who is talking about old days and uses the N word gets shot in the face and dies from a thug in the new world. Yes, I am over exaggerating a little, but tell me I am wrong! The story changed directions so many times that I could hardly keep up with the dialogue. From what I could pick up, the story is basically the old world vs the new. By using the term "world" I am referring to eras. As in the time before the modern era vs the modern era. A time when "good men" existed. A time when people had respect for each other and there were somethings even a criminal would not do, e.g. murder granny. Granny's pleas were chilling. She held on to the belief that somehow the man would not kill her.

    Granny believed in the sliver of goodness known as human morals. This was shown to not exist anymore. The kids died as well along with everyone else. They all die. Is that not the modern era at its finest? Innocents killed in cold blood, morality a dissolved ash heap, nobleness a dead virtue, and other lovely ideals seem to coat the modern era. This story was depressing and incredibly negative. I wish I could argue that it is not true, but in many ways it is. I honestly have seen too many stories of crimes back home in Louisiana that mimic this one. Innocents die all the time. Why someone would want to make a book about it, I do not know. However after finishing this story at 12:35 am all I can say is what in tarnation was that? This truly was a tragic story. 

I commented on Abigale Bell and Braylan Stringfellow

 

Comments

  1. I think the biggest thing O'Connor was trying to point out was that loosely held morals are not even really morals worth holding at all. Take the grandmother for example. She claimed to believe and hold many things as good morals and yet in the face of danger and even in daily life she never lived those out. It was just talk. If O'Connor was trying to say anything about the old and new, I would 'put it to you' that she was trying to show the hypocrisy we always seem to see in the generation before us. So much of our generation is beginning to realize things are not the way they're supposed to be. --Emmett Bryant

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Emmett. My takeaway that the grandmother is not truly good although in her head she is. She wants to be seen as a lady if she hypothetically dies, but she is selfish in the story. Josh, your interpretation of it is not one I've heard before though and it is extremely interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed your post, and I agree that there is a lot to learn about these writings. I thought they were very interesting and have layers of meaning that I am missing out on. However, I thought that the grandmother's ignorance and O'Connor's attack on an older generation was very fitting, and thus in both stories they got what was coming to them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the stories darkness have a purpose. The shockingness of them makes you ponder and reread them more than a happy tale with some moral point to it. (I mean, LOTR??? It can be SO dark but it holds so many lessons) The use of irony and stereotyped characters achieve this well alongside the grimness.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A House Divided//Emily Otts

The Plague in Everyone// Emily Otts

The Thirst for Knowledge